I believe human behavior can be predicted and boiled down to equations which would accurately predict the future. It’s a given that there are human archetypes the most popular system of archetypes currently is MBTI, which is a watered down adulterated version of Carl Jungs archetypes. So while MBTI does offer some useful insight in how the human mind operates it’s also greatly flawed. The two major flaws in my opinion are A) mistypes, people are unable to type themselves appropriately 9 out of 10 times and B) it by and large ignores cognitive function. Which are the keystone of how the human mind perceives and processes data so to ignore these functions is ignoring valuable data. 

Now everyone is a special snowflake and all that jazz, but there are a finite amount of archetypes and sub archetypes, and how someone was raised and life experiences can change someone as well; there will still be the underlying functions of how data of the outside world is processed. If the archetype is underdeveloped most of the time they will react the same across the board. While there may be other variables which can change the outcome an underdeveloped archetype is as predictable (and enjoyable) as a Three’s Company episode. 

The main reason I write this is because I know a couple. Who have been squabbling and fighting a lot recently. I really don’t like it, I even made the joke “now I know what it’s like to have divorced parents,” in a true Chandler Bing moment. My actual point is that their behavior is highly predictable to the point where I want to claw the walls or my skin off. 

While I said humans are highly predictable creatures there is one variable which will throw my equation out the window, and require additional thought. Which is if the person isn’t an underdeveloped idiot. If they are a developed archetype then their behavior is less predictable. An underdeveloped archetype has more in common with a simple animal than actual humans. 

Time is the overall constant variable in each equation. People can put on facades and thin veils to try to cover up what really resides underneath. As time passes these masks will slowly erode, the true mechanisms become apparent, and the true identity is revealed. 

People of course can change their inner workings and develop themselves mentally and archetypically, but it requires work and dedicated. Which most people do not have in this quick fix drive through society. 

My dad sent me an lamp he made. It’s just an Absolut vodka bottle with a hole drilled in the back at the bottom, with white christmas lights shoved in. It’s cute and fairly simple.

I called to thank my dad and congratulate him on his new hobby, and then offered a suggestion that fell on deaf ears. I told told him that making alcohol bottles into bongs is just drilling the hole in a different spot, and then explained the additional materials he would need. Essentially trying to hand my father a business/hobby he could do in his retirement, which would be far more profitable than booze bottle lamps. He didn’t really care or listen, and that’s what pissed me off. I knew before I called him that he wasn’t going to get into the business of converting old alcohol bottles into bongs, but just how he didn’t listen. My father is retarded when it comes to business, and I’m no genius myself, but I can see an opportunity when it presents itself. If you get the alcohol bottles for free then the only overhead would be rubber stoppers, intake pipe, and slider. Which bought in bulk would be dirt cheap. It’s a pretty fucking apparent business plan, but he didn’t listen, and didn’t care. That’s what’s so upsetting really, he fucking complains about the economy and then fails to see an opportunity to make money. 

Nobody fucking listens anymore, it’s enraging.

Cat babies part 2: Wearmy’s litter (Taken with instagram)

Wearmy struggles with motherhood. (Taken with instagram)

Battling cat babies (Taken with instagram)

Sup aliens, now I’m not sure if you’re into breeding humans, but I’ve recently was thrown into the position of breeding cats. Cat breeding has always fascinating me, passing on favorable genetic traits though the process of breeding. This also fascinates me though breeding other things too, such as marijuana, and the process of creating a new strain through the breeding of plants. But I am in the position of breeding cats. 

The mother: Sparkle Boots: SB has always been a favorite of mine since I’ve first seen her. She was captured in a Motel 6 parking lot, but unlike the other cats capturing her didn’t require a trap, because she just ran up my feet and was able to be picked up and was hardly noticeable she was feral. Her initial name was “Batman” on account of her facial markings resembling a cape and cowl. This was later changed to the name Sparkle Boots. Her size is tiny, I consider her to be a tiny regular size cat or a large miniature cat. She also has the attribute of having a crooked tail, which resembles a lightening bolt. Initially I thought her tail was broken since she was caught in a Motel 6 parking lot, but it appears this trait has been passed down to some of litter. Meaning that her tail is genetically like that and broken in the wild. I also have her litter sibling with the same kind of markings, Applebee’s, who’s tail which seems to be slightly longer than normal. 

The father: Cat Doe: The father of the litter is a feral stray. So I am unaware of its personality. I have observed the cat so I am aware of his attributes. He is a gray long hair cat. His size is tiny, and his legs can be best described as “stumpy.” The legs appear to have shorter than average legs. I wasn’t sure if this was genetic or caused by the cat living under a shed.

The Litter: The litter is around 2 weeks old at this point. They are moving around and developing personalities. There are four kittens 2 of one markings and 2 of another, and some appear to be long hair as well. The interesting thing is some of the genetic traits that appear to have been passed down. Some of the cats have stumpy legs like the father, where they look shorter than normal. Some also appear to have Sparkle Boots crooked lightening bolt tail too. 

What is truly unexpected, and thoroughly exciting, is it appears that cat personality can be passed along as well. I’m very familiar with Sparkle Boot’s personality as she was my favorite because of her behavior and personality. It appears that one of her kittens has similar mannerisms that Sparkle Boots had at a young age. 

So is breeding humans similar aliens? Like should people put more thought into who they have sex with, because their children less than desirable. I’m not advocating eugenics. Goodness no, but I am advocating thinking before fucking. Those baby things lost a long fucking time.

The argument that all marijuana use is medicinal, or wellness, is very obtuse in its very essence, because is it only applicable in California. I use medical marijuana for my depression, which has more or less been constant in most of my life since I was in high school. I’ve been on a variety of antidepressants since I was around 16, and none of them have worked as well as smoking marijuana. This would clearly be a case that yes I am benefiting from consuming marijuana in a medicinal sense. Except no state other than California acknowledges that my use of marijuana as medicinal. Every state, other than California, list of medicinal uses are very narrow and involve chronic pain, anorexia, cancer, AIDS, and other debilitating illnesses which I do not have any of those illnesses. So the argument that all marijuana use is medicinal use works in California, because in California the law clearly states that if you think marijuana helps you and your doctor agrees then you are a medical marijuana candidate. This includes therapeutic use as well. So arguing that all use is medicinal use, or wellness, is a poor argument for marijuana because you are arguing on logic, which may be held by common cannabis enthusiasts, is not held by anyone else. By arguing all marijuana is medicinal use, or wellness, it’s making an argument on the foundation which isn’t held, or even known, by many. This argument is essentially a riddle and logical intelligent debate is not on the foundation of riddles.

Marijuana is a schedule one drug, which means it has no medicinal value. So claiming that all marijuana use is wellness is making an argument that the government doesn’t even acknowledge and individuals will have trouble grasping as well. By fighting that all use is wellness and medicinal without the groundwork of reclassifying marijuana is fighting a fight completely ass backwards. The important thing to do is to make people educated about all of the wonderful benefits that marijuana has to offer first we must have them accept that marijuana is not a dangerous drug and that marijuana is classified incorrectly on the drug scheduling list. So arguing on logic that isn’t universally held I consider to be a piss poor way to educate people on the wonderful delightful benefits of marijuana.

Marijuana by being a schedule one drug means that it is highly addictive and holds no medicinal benefits what so ever. Now there is a mountain of anecdotal evidence suggesting that marijuana is the farthest thing from a schedule one substance.  Under this umbrella of logical fallacy cocaine, meth, opium, ketamine, and steroids are all safer than marijuana. Even though marijuana has never caused a death and studies show that caffeine is more addictive and habit forming than marijuana.

There is also the problem of maintaining the system of medicinal marijuana, and the question of “Do I really need to see a doctor?”  I smoked marijuana for years before becoming a medical marijuana patient. I knew long before I went to a doctor that marijuana benefited me a great deal by consuming it on a regular schedule. When I went to the doctor everything she told me I was already well aware of in my years of researching marijuana. So why exactly do I need to go see a doctor once a year and pay them around a 100 dollars for a quick chat, exam, and to be told information I’m already aware of? I think as a free intelligent individual I am fully capable of making an informed decision of if marijuana benefits me or not.  Paying a doctor annually simply takes money out of my pocket, and gives it to someone else, for no good reason. Sure people could benefit from talking to a doctor if they’ve never used marijuana and they are unsure if medical marijuana is for them then a doctor may be of some use, but that should be a decision between a patient and a doctor.  Handing over a piece of paper stating I’m a medical marijuana patient isn’t making cannabis any safer for individuals. Doctors have no real knowledge of marijuana and the countless strains that are out there. 

Medical marijuana is nice, but it should not be the end goal of the marijuana community. The only way to allow the marijuana industry to be able to thrive is through complete legalization.  This country flourished because of hemp and all of its industrial uses. It was once considered legal tender and Thomas Jefferson risked his life smuggling hemp seeds out of China are just two of the many fun facts about marijuana embedded in American history. With a continuing downward spiral of America today one thing that can save it is jobs/industry/business, and one way to help create some jobs and some industry is with complete legalization, of both marijuana and hemp.  We would create an industry that can supply a lot of jobs and income for struggling America at the very least.

Hey aliens, I’m sure you’ve heard a lot about this Steve Jobs fellow, and I’m here to explain to you why you shouldn’t believe the hype.

I’m not sure about the facts here but did Steve Jobs actually invent the ipod? Or did he simply own the business that created the ipod? Don’t get me wrong, I was thrilled when the first generation ipod was released and switched over to mac a few months later, because at the time being able to hold 5 gigs of music on something the size of a pack of cigarettes was rather breath taking. No more having to lug around a binder of CD’s, a total game changer. But did Steve Jobs actually invent the ipod?

Now I haven’t read his biography or watched the documentary which I’m assuming hands Steve Jobs the title of “billion dollar hippy.” But it’s probably safe to assume that they claim that he’s a billion dollar hippy. I mean why not he’s done acid, and clearly anyone who’s ever tried LSD must be a hippy. Sure he exploits third world labor, just like every other corporate overlord does, but he probably also promotes green energy or some shit. And everyone knows you can use slave labor to offset your carbon footprint, duh.

Now I know what you’re thinking “But in order to be complacent brain dead pig people consumers we NEED third world labor.” Well you do have a point, yes in order to have the low low prices we are all accustomed to we need to export jobs (which could be American jobs) and ship them overseas so Asians can die in sweat shops (not to be confused with sweet shops). Except there’s one gapping flaw in this logic, and that is Apple has more money, in cash reserves, than the US government. Now clearly this must be some brilliant scheme that only a LSD loving hippy could come up with.  We need to export jobs to manufacture our products at slave labor costs, using slave labor, tell people this is the way it HAS to be, and then have more money than the US government.

Fun conspiratorial fact: Apple was funded by the Rockefeller family, or some company they own; same shit.

Clearly there is a cult of personality surrounding Steve Jobs. People love the man and praise him as a saint. I don’t get it, or even come close to comprehending it, but I suppose it would be a testament to consumerism that he has been elevated to a god like status. His company invented handy items consumers eat up. That doesn’t necessary make him the greatest mind/inventor since (some arbitrary name). I mean compare the man to someone like Nikola Tesla and he looks like a retarded kid eating crayons.

I could be wrong here aliens. For example you do praise the consumerist gods on your fancy alien planet? Or do you furrow your brow (or whatever you furrow) at mindless pig people, and laugh then compare them to various animals you maintain as livestock? I generally furrow my brow and make comparisons to livestock.

Hey aliens, there’s a lot of rhetoric and opinions that go along the lines of “you’re with us or you’re against us.” I’m not sure exactly when this enemy of logic and reason was born, but it appears it is here to stay.

The phrase was made famous by George W. Bush before he invaded Iraq for weapons of mass destruction. Then when he said it everyone had a good laugh at the absurdity of the statement. Except then something unspeakable happened; everyone adapted that irrational paradigm of logic. I’m not sure how it happened, but when you’re out and about in this world it’s how people think.

The people who get shit on the most with this faulty paradigm are generally libertarians or anyone with an opinion that differs from anyone else. People will praise that we should all get along, but then when times comes when you have a different opinion than them they get weirded out.

An example of this that I saw today were people claiming Ron Paul supports sexual harassment. Except he didn’t say that he supports sexual harassment. His belief is that the federal government shouldn’t legislate things like sexual harassment, and that the definition of sexual harassment was too subjective to clearly define what constitutes as sexual harassment. He never stated that the workplace should be home of the free to grope, molest, and jizz on who ever gives you a hard on. But people walk away that since Ron Paul is against federal law dictating sexual harassment he must clearly be for sexual harassment.

The argument that “you’re with us or against us” is a logical fallacy since there is always more than one opinion on any subject. So when people come to the conclusion that “If you’re for A, then you must be against B.”

Another example of this can be American politics and the Republican and Democrat paradigm that exists. If you’re against one party it does not necessarily mean that you’re for the other party. Yet people still walk away thinking this absurd thought. To break this down simply I will cola as an example.

The two major cola companies in the united states are Coca-cola and Pepsi. They even share the same colors as the two major political parties, red and blue. Now if you’re for one it doesn’t necessary mean you’re against the other. What if you don’t care for coca-cola or pepsi what about lesser known colas that exist. They’re overlooked and laughed at, Royal Crown cola would be an example of this. What about variety of colas that can be found at grocery stores such as Whole Foods, or a grocer that’s similar. Clearly there are more options to cola than Coke or Pepsi, but most people forget about those or laugh at other companies; just like political parties, ideologies, and any view that differs from their own.

In short aliens what I’m trying to tell you is that humans are terribly stupid. They are tricked and duped into believing just about anything they’re told. Don’t even get me started on statistics.

Hey aliens, there’s a lot of negative talk these days about conspiracy theories. I’m not saying everyone is true, or even which ones have a leg to stand on. Instead I’m going to give you the wonderful guide to why conspiracy theories are not entirely crazy.

First we must define our view of history. What you can different perspectives on history? Well of course you can there is the accidental view of history; things happen, who knows why. Then there is the conspiratorial view of history; things happen because people make them happen.

Second, we need to look at what a conspiracy is exactly. The most common definition is when two or more people meet in secrecy. Some definitions throw the word “evil” into the definition which I find subjective and not necessarily true. It seems to be a logically fallacy to assume all conspiracies are evil. Can two people conspire to do something nice? I don’t see any reason why they couldn’t. So to be fair and objective we will ignore defining conspiracies as “evil,” and view them as simply two or more people meeting in secrecy.

Now if we even glance over the history of the human race it is clear that corruption and conspiracies have existed within structures of power. If you look at various governments, business, banks, powerful humans, and basically any institution where you have a wealth of power and influence there will have been corruption and conspiracies at one point in time or another.

So the question is why not now? What makes it so apparent that conspiracies are no longer something to worry about? Or could never happen ever again? Did humans all of a sudden become impervious to being drunk on power? Did politician, bureaucrats, bankers, businesses, and any centralized power all of a sudden become more than human?  I don’t see any evidence that would suggest centralized powers all of a sudden became trustworthy aside from telling us they are. Which simply saying something doesn’t count as any evidence, and doesn’t make anything true. I can state that I’m the queen of England, and just because I say it does not make it true.

Humans are fundamentally flawed in the sense that we are not perfect, and we will never be perfect. So why and how can people just blindly assume that people of power are perfect all of a sudden? I don’t see any evidence to suggest regular ditch digging man is flawed, let alone a bureaucrat or person of power is perfect.

So aliens when you come to Earth, and if you don’t decide to exterminate the human race for being a bunch of brain dead monkeys. Make sure to question authority, and not just assume what some monkey man said is true.